About Me

Name: Teri O'Brien
Email: teriobrien@mac.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Pelosi and Obama Go Nuclear

From the “Nuclear Option” to “Reconcilation,” to “A Simple Up or Down Vote,” whatever George Lackoff, some other brilliant communications maven or focus group tells him will play best with the mouth-breathing rubes, it is Barack Hussein Obama’s chosen tactic to realize his grand vision of a “remade” America by taking over, and eventually destroying, the best health care system on earth. After seeing those big, inflatable beavers last night at the closing ceremony for the 2010 Winter Olympics, I’d think that he would have more compassion for the Canadians. Where are they supposed to go for their heart procedures after he wrecks our health care system? 


Just last Thursday, at the end of his ridiculous seven hour PR stunt, B. Hussein made it clear that he is prepared to govern against the will of the American public by saying the following:


"We cannot have another year-long debate about this," he said, rejecting Republican calls to scrap the Democrats' legislation. "So the question that I'm going to ask myself and I ask of all of you is, is there enough serious effort that in a month's time or a few weeks' time or six weeks' time we could actually resolve something?"


Wait a second--what happened to the six weeks? I guess when he said that he figured that we would all realize, either based on past experience with him, or on the press reports that plans were already in the works to go full speed ahead with the nuclear option to ram this 2400 page monstrosity through, that it was him talking again, you know, sort of like that guy at work who you know is full of crap and who you have learned to never take seriously. 

What do you mean we can’t have another year-long debate? Really? We’re talking about the most important piece of legislation in forty years? What’s the rush, Barry? Are you still trying to outrun the truth about this hideous, unconstitutional scheme? Two words for you: too late.

Meanwhile, John McCain is in full Yosemite Sam mode, either because he understands how destructive this stinking pile of legislative droppings is, or because he’s in a primary battle with J.D. Hayworth. I seem to recall trying to explain to Sen. McCain back in 2005 that the whole “Gang of 14” thing, which was undertaken to end democrat obstruction of President Bush’s judicial nominees, as well intentioned as it was, was a bad idea, and that if he thought it was justified because it would protect the integrity of procedures in the Senate, he was deluding himself. That’s like saying that if we stop depriving terrorists of their supposed (and non-existent) civil rights under the U.S. Constitution, they’ll stop lopping of the heads of the infidel. I wonder if Daniel Pearl would agree with that theory. Let's ask him. Oh, wait …Now that the democrats are in charge, are they the slightest bit concerned about protecting the integrity of Senate procedures? Hell no. They aren't even concerned about the fact that the American people, who are supposed to be their employers, do not want this bill. 

Why, you may be asking, would Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama want their members to vote for a bill that is overwhelmingly opposed by most Americans? The answer is simple. The only thing Pelosi has to fear from her constituents is anger that instead of immediately imposing a single payer system, she and Sham WOW (Walks on Water) are pursuing an incremental route toward the same goal.  They’ll get over it when they see how fast the private system is demolished under the weight of federal mandates, regulations and the other profit-killing schemes imposed on it. Speaker Pelosi's constituents voted for B. Hussein 85% to 15% for McCain. It’s easy for her to say, as she did yesterday on one of the Sunday shows, that members must have the “courage” to vote in favor of something that the majority of people in the country don’t want. Don't worry, Blue Dog democrats. The Speaker will be there to wave goodbye to you as you go over the cliff. 

As for the man-god himself, this bill will accomplish two objectives. First, represents the opportunity to expand the size and power of the federal government over every aspect of our lives. For a dyed-in-the-wool radical leftist like Barack Obama, imagining this dream becoming real is like Tiger Woods imagining a weekend at the Bunny Ranch.  Second, it will go a long way to redress the “unfairness” of the wicked "mean" Amerika that his wife Michelle Antoinette has lamented all of her adult life, by transferring the wealth of the 80% work hard to provide for themselves and their families to the 20%, semi-literate unqualified entitlement obsessed minorities, lazy, irresponsible indifferent single mothers and their worthless sperm donors, the “undocumented,” and other would-be beneficiaries of Barack’s stash. There is no greater prize or greater accomplishment for the Community-Organizer-in Chief.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Like That Full-Time Makeup Artist, Even Barbara Walters Can't Make Michelle Obama Look Good


    I take no pleasure-well, maybe a little-in what I’m about to say, but I’m fed up with the ridiculous and endlessly repeated attempts to enlist sane Americans in the Obama cult of the personality. 


    The occasion for this rant is Barbara Walter’s declaration of Michelle Antoinette Obama as THE MOST FASCINATING PERSON of 2009 on her “Ten Most Fascinating People of 2009” show. A couple of questions are probably occurring to you right now: What? Fidel Castro, a murderous dictator who Ms. Walters also finds “fascinating”, wasn’t in the running? How long will it take the network executives who air this drivel to figure out why their ratings are going down faster than Tiger Woods’ latest conquest?


    But I digress. Back to our subject. Michelle Obama the most fascinating person of 2009 …I can totally see that, if by “fascinating” you mean bitter, race-obsessed, and just generally repellant.  The announcement was accompanied by the predictable, nauseating and obligatory pronouncements about her “confident style,” her great beauty, and her--wait for it--arms.pastedGraphic.pdf


    This moronic and pointless show (yes, I still watch so you don’t have to) featured the following unbelievable exchange, slated on screen as, and I am NOT making this up, as you can see from the screenshot below, “Michelle Obama’s ‘Revenge’ The Story Behind Her Arms,” between the superannuated, self-important simpleminded news reader and the First Klingon (my comments in red, link to video here--the arm thing starts at about 1:55:


BW: Can we talk about your arms?

MO:My arms? Why certainly!

Why would you want to talk about my arms?

(Gee, I don’t know to avoid discussing anything that might actually matter to anyone?)

BW: Do you feel pressured to have great arms? Do you have to get up every day and do the exercises? I'm glad you wore a sleeveless dress. (slobber slobber)

(Yeah, Barb, thanks for reminding me to do that. Otherwise, what would we have to talk about. How many stories about my vegetable garden can you do? Besides, the weather sucks right now, so no garden photo ops, darn it!)

MO: My personal routine hasn't changed much in the past 11 years. I mean I really started after I had Malia, our oldest and some of that was in all honesty sort of…um…a little revenge because I'm married to a man who has worked out all of his life, and regardless of how busy he is, he finds the time to work out  and there was a point when I got a little resentful of that.

(Fortunately, I told Barack that if didn’t want to be on the receiving end of an Elin Woods-style golf club smack down, he had better get his skinny rear end

 in gear and pull the right strings to get me a no-show, 6-figure gig so I would have to time to work out as much as he could. Who does he think has been raising his two brats while he’s been galavanting all over speechifying and politicking?)

So, you know, if there's anything I can attribute these arms to, it's probably just determination (annoying nervous laugh)


Good Lord! Are you hearing this foolishness? I know that as the Grand Dame of ABC’s weekday socialist hen party “The View,” Barbara has demonstrated her complete inability to reason her way out of a paper bag, but this is ridiculous. I am endlessly amazed by these “serious” journalists who don’t have the slightest intellectual curiosity about the contents of the health care bill we are being asked to swallow against our will, but are obsessed with the physical attributes of the objects of their affection. Whether it’s Lynn Sweet wanting to follow Barack Obama into the locker room, or BW drooling over Michelle’s very ordinary arms, it never ends. Geez, as the expression goes, get a room! More important, how about the First Klingon? This woman can’t even talk about exercise without mentioning being resentful! She is an endless font of seething rage, and even when her PR flaks like Ms. Walters try to paper over her bitterness by asking idiotic questions about her arms, she can’t help but let it ooze out. 


    Barbara Walters, Chris Matthews and other slobbering members of the Lame Stream Media. You guys quit gushing over Michelle Obama’s arms, which are quite unremarkable, particularly for wealthy women with over 20 staff members to do their bidding so that they have plenty of time with their personal trainers, and I won’t mention the one physical attribute she has that is very exceptional and substantial, the only thing larger than her sense of entitlement, which you will notice in this video. I will also refrain from pointing out her huge, frightening teeth, which are reminiscent of Godzilla. Even her full-time makeup artist can’t do much to cover up what nature did to this woman. I mean, it’s a brush, not a wand. Any of you thinking of sending me one of those “it’s so unattractive and so beneath us to make catty remarks about her appearance” notes, or something similar, please don’t waste your timepastedGraphic_1.pdf. I’m sorry if my pointing out what is obvious to the sighted I offends your prissy sensibilities. Maybe you should enter the Miss America contest. Better yet, drop a note to Ms. Walters, telling her that Michelle is more like one of the most Fascist people of 2009, or any other recent year, along with that phony empty suit she’s married to.  Instead of telling me to be nice and refrain from stating the obvious, write to Babs and suggest that some of us, those with functioning eyes, don’t appreciate being held down and force fed, like one of those foie gras geese, this foolishness about Malignant Michelle’s being the second coming of Jacqueline Kennedy, particularly when it’s being done to distract us from the destruction of the country we grew up in. This beast stomping all over the planet with her ginormous feet clad in $1000 boots and $600 sneakers and the rest is not beautiful, is not graceful, is not a fashion icon, and the only thing fascinating about her is her ability, one that she shares with her husband, to enchant, even hypnotize, guilty white liberals, so that they are rendered blind to what is right in front of their eyes; that is, her terrifying physical appearance, and her more terrifying, anti-American philosophy and their plans to shake down productive citizens for the reparations that they view as essential to redress all the unfairness inflicted on humanity by the United States. Maybe it’s just me, but when I see her, I keep thinking about her lecturing us thusly:


“The truth is, in order to get things like universal health care and a revamped education system, then someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more."


    Who do you think she means by “someone,” who is going to give up something up? As she, her husband and their merry band of Marxists work to “remake” America, and herd you, and your family into Medicaid alongside the “someone else” can “have more,” namely illegal aliens, bums, beneficiaries of “Barack’s stash” and the other victims of this mean country, do you think they will join you? Will she forego “date nights” and Parisian shopping sprees? As for that “revamped” education system, will Sasha and Malia be enrolled in it, or will they stay in their cushy private school while democrats deny poor DC children scholarships to escape the public school gulag demanded by teachers’ unions? I’ll leave the answers to you. Too bad Babs didn’t ask the brilliant Michelle about that.


    I can admire a well-toned set of triceps as well as the next person. The Gym Goddesses and I pride ourselves on our awesome arms; however, no matter how nice the arms, I can’t help but notice that they are attached to a person who presents herself as a just-plain-folks Mom-in-Chief when the reality is that she is not only a second-generation Chicago patronage pol, but an unpatriotic angry affirmative action beneficiary with a huge chip on her shoulder hell-bent on “remaking” my country.


    So, LSM, please stop telling this risible fairy tales about her great beauty to try to distract us and I won’t mention her physical appearance anymore. Let’s both stick to her policy ideas, which are still fair game. Deal?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Politics, Pop Culture, the Hottest Issues of the Day, and Your calls. The Teri O'Brien Show, featuring America’s Original Conservative Warrior Princess, Live and in color, Sundays 2-3:30 pm Central time  at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Teri-OBrien. Daring to Commit Common Sense, Fearlessly, and More Important, Cheerfully, in the Age of Obama.

Can’t listen live? Download it from iTunes and listen on demand. 

As one listener wrote “one of the most insightful and entertaining pundits in America. Also, her voice is magical.”

Serious Ideas, Irresistible Entertainment. Warning: listeners may become hopelessly addicted.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »